Discussion:
[Evangelism] Fwd: Plone is back on ohloh
Jon Stahl
2009-10-08 00:43:25 UTC
Permalink
FYI.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hanno Schlichting <***@hannosch.eu>
Date: Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Plone is back on ohloh
To: Jon Stahl <***@gmail.com>


Hi Jon.

I sent this a while back to the evangelism list, but it seems to have
been lost in the moderator queue.

Hanno

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hanno Schlichting <***@hannosch.eu>
Date: Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:11 PM
Subject: Plone is back on ohloh
To: evangelism <***@lists.plone.org>

Hi.

ohloh.net has been acquired by SourceForge a while back, giving me
some hope, that they'll be able to improve their service again. I've
therefor put Plone back onto ohloh (https://www.ohloh.net/p/plone)

Their standard short analysis is both favorable and correct. The info
about ratings, reviews, "who uses" and "who contributes" is correct as
well. The underlying data represents plone-coredev trunk, which means
Plone 5 right now. The number of lines of code for that release looks
correct as well.

But: The whole historical view of any data is pretty much useless.
Neither the LOC history nor the number of commits per contributor are
anywhere close to being correct.

This is a limitation of the ohloh.net service, which we cannot do
anything about right now. Just be aware of it, if someone tries to
quote or use any of this data.

Thanks,
Hanno
Jon Stahl
2009-10-07 19:42:58 UTC
Permalink
FYI.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hanno Schlichting <hanno at hannosch.eu>
Date: Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Plone is back on ohloh
To: Jon Stahl <jonstahl at gmail.com>


Hi Jon.

I sent this a while back to the evangelism list, but it seems to have
been lost in the moderator queue.

Hanno

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hanno Schlichting <hanno at hannosch.eu>
Date: Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:11 PM
Subject: Plone is back on ohloh
To: evangelism <evangelism at lists.plone.org>

Hi.

ohloh.net has been acquired by SourceForge a while back, giving me
some hope, that they'll be able to improve their service again. I've
therefor put Plone back onto ohloh (https://www.ohloh.net/p/plone)

Their standard short analysis is both favorable and correct. The info
about ratings, reviews, "who uses" and "who contributes" is correct as
well. The underlying data represents plone-coredev trunk, which means
Plone 5 right now. The number of lines of code for that release looks
correct as well.

But: The whole historical view of any data is pretty much useless.
Neither the LOC history nor the number of commits per contributor are
anywhere close to being correct.

This is a limitation of the ohloh.net service, which we cannot do
anything about right now. Just be aware of it, if someone tries to
quote or use any of this data.

Thanks,
Hanno

Loading...